James Bond (Sean Connery) delivers his first one-liner in the first movie, Dr. No (1962) after Bond eludes and eventually permanently subdues a baddie in a car chase in his Sunbeam Alpine. The cinematography of the scene is without a doubt memorable and has a distinct, vintage look common in such movie scenes in the 1960s and earlier (and is sometimes replicated for nostalgic purposes in modern arthouse movies).
Anyways, after Bond drives his adversary off a cliff, he callously answers to a road worker’s “what happened” question with a menacing quip. In my opinion, it’s a bit brash for the scene, and doesn’t make complete sense. I mean, if they were on their way to a funeral, I guess Bond is technically implying it would be their own funeral since they die in the scene. But then again, the act of dying in a car crash isn’t really a funeral in and of itself…right?
Whatever. I never found myself laughing at the line, especially after the fiery death we are subjected to as the car plummets down the embankment. It’s also a bit odd (and I’m sure it’s a limitation of filming such a scene in the 1960s) that the car explodes in the passenger area and not in an anticipated spot such as the car’s engine or gas tank. The explosion happens almost in the front seat, and an obvious effigy flails wildly and burns as the scene ends.
So although it’s not the most appropriate or funny of James Bond one-liners, it still is significant as it’s the first ever – and there’s something awesome about that!
Herve Villechaize’s portrayal of henchman Nick Nack in The Man With The Golden Gun (1974) packs a pint-sized punch, but is a bit of an enigma. The bizarre setup of the start of the movie with Nick Nack as ringmaster in assassin Scaramanga’s survival-of-the-fittest circus is difficult at first to understand. But eventually, their interactions exhibit an almost trainer/trainee relationship, unique for a character pair relationship in any other James Bond movie.
Villechaize is such an interesting choice for the role, and it always makes me wonder how it’d differ with a traditional actor cast. And the more I think about it, the more I believe it was a casting that paid off. Villechaize’s unnerving voice and nuanced French accent is perfect as a vulnerable but all-knowing sidekick to Christopher Lee’s seemingly untouchable Scaramanga. There are a few times where we see Scaramanga’s annoyance with his minion, but it always ends with Scaramanga (if not begrudgingly) appreciating Nick Nack’s tests to hone the world class assassin’s skill. As in the clip above, that teasing Nick Nack voice only pushes Scaramanga harder to overcome the odds set before him, and implies that Scaramanga’s successes are a direct result of Nick Nack’s efforts.
There are a few scenes where Nick Nack uses his small stature to his benefit, but in the later scenes of the movie it does in part lead to his eventual demise…or at least his “caging” in the final boat scene. We always have to have to remember, however, that he was *this* close to killing the world’s greatest secret agent, James Bond, by way of a drop-in stabbing. Even though his mouth knife-holding method always gave me pause! Ouch!
This is a great 30 second summary of Live And Let Die (1973), from a short 30 second scene from itself – the scene where Bond (Roger Moore) and Solitaire (Jane Seymour) escape San Monique. Bond summarizes that the entire Kananga operation and voodoo mystique on the island was a front for heroin smuggling. I’ve always said that the simpler a Bond villain’s plot in any James Bond movie, the better.
Also, now that Solitaire has finally lost her “magic,” she is horny. Really horny.
I love when we get a glimpse into how “to get” to a villain’s physical location. It’s one thing to hear a villain’s speech or sit in on a SPECTRE meeting scene, but a whole other bit of awesomeness to take into account setup location shots and see where you would actually find a world-class villain. Not necessarily in a hollowed-out volcano or some other stereotypical villainous “lair” that Bond laymen refer to, but as in the case here in From Russia With Love (1963), an unassuming, anchored luxury yacht (steamship?) off a beautiful coastal city.
In the scene, we see SPECTRE Number 5 Kronsteen summoned from his victorious chess match to this luxury liner to meet his faceless and heavily guarded boss, the movie’s villain and head of SPECTRE – Ernst Stavro Blofeld. Alongside Blofeld is the uncharacteristically nervous Rosa Klebb (Lotte Lenya) whose pointy shoes won’t help her out here. She’s chopped liver in this scene, and she knows it.
The faceless Blofeld is effective here, even though his fascination with the fighting fish is a bit disconcerting. He seems to have properly small-sized and compartmentalized tanks for betta fighting fish, but they look to be halfway filled and raise so man questions as to their maintenance and upkeep on the boat. (he likes these kinds of fish *that* much?
Klebb would agree to the oddity, and can only muster that his comparison of SPECTRE to a lurking fighting fish killing a weakened one was “amusing.” Blofeld is trying to say that SPECTRE as a whole “strikes” when they are most effective – regardless if it’s up against a weakened or oblivious opponent, it’s at the right time.
Russia‘s villain’s eccentricity is on display here a bit, but what I wouldn’t give to check out that awesome bar/lounge combo in that boat!
The Draco/Bond raid of Piz Gloria at the end of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969) is definitely a highlight of the movie. Lazenby’s Bond is dressed in a tactical navy jumpsuit in what many would say is his best outfit (no puffy shirts or kilts here) and the surprising use of the original Monty Norman James Bond theme sets the tone of the action sequence. Yes, you can enhance any James Bond movie scene by playing the original theme, but the addition of it here was a pleasant surprise and added just enough nostalgia to, in my opinion, truly cement George Lazenby as the character James Bond in his first and only appearance as 007.
Over the last 30 years, I’d also say that OHMSS has made the most stunning turnaround (at least for fans in my generation – I’m a late 90’s James Bond) in best-of lists – from a forgotten write-off of a James Bond movie to one of the most revered. It only gets better with each viewing.
I hear Max the Parrot’s stupid line in my sleep after watching For Your Eyes Only (1981). Why even have the bird in the movie? Was it *really* that important to have this kind of slapstick comic relief in a James Bond movie? Let alone animal slapstick comedy? It’s one of the questionable scenes in FYEO that puzzle me to this day alongside the “hockey” scene that holds its own in the eye-rolling department.
Sure – like all James Bond movies – FYEO has some good parts, but overall I’m not its biggest fan.
At the start of For Your Eyes Only (1981), we see James Bond (Roger Moore) visit the grave of his late wife, Teresa Bond:
The inscription reads:
TERESA BOND
1943 – 1969
Beloved wife of
JAMES BONDWe have all the
time in the World
Although I like the fact that they finally acknowledged the death of Bond’s wife, it’s puzzling that it took a full 12 years (an entire six Bond movies) since On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969) when she was murdered, to do so. Surely such a traumatic death would have affected Bond greatly, and I’d say Diamonds Are Forever (1971) (the follow-up to OHMSS) is flawed at the outset for at least not referencing it while Bond traipse around Las Vegas.
Maybe they decided to put it on the backburner because it’s obviously a sad event, and nobody wants to be sad watching a James Bond movie (ahem, NTTD). Or maybe the death was such a big event in the series they decided to avoid acknowledging (or forgot?) it until a lot of time had passed…was this Bond’s first visit to the grave?
Kind of a missed opportunity in my eyes, regardless. They could’ve worked a graveside visit later into the movie (who wants to see Bond graveside visit in a movie’s opening sequence anyway? ahem, again, NTTD!) or weaved it into a joint revenge plot with Melina Havelock’s revenge of her parents’ death. All in all, I’m glad they made the reference to Tracy’s death but the method could’ve been better. And a pity it was rather forgotten after this scene until NTTD really.
There isn’t a more brutal James Bond villain than Franz Sanchez (Robert Davi) from Licence To Kill (1989). In this scene alone, Sanchez shows his true self: a murderer, torturer and abuser.
Unlike other Bond villains, Sanchez is intimately involved in the cruel ways he shows his power. He doesn’t sit on a throne and stroking a white cat or avoid conflict by pushing a button in an escape pod. No – without hesitation, Sanchez orders a murder and tortures a defenseless woman.
Lupe’s somber “por favor, Franz” and the unsettlingly compliant way she bows to him for punishment is just awful and an obviously regular occurrence. And it’s telling that Sanchez comes with the small whip on his person – he knew Lupe’s fate before listening to any explanation.
Although disturbing, it’s scenes like this that define a Bond villain. It distinguishes Sanchez’s darker persona from other villains that take a more hands-off approach to evil.